

Mental Health and Psychosocial Support
for Health EDRM
Lead research institution:
Department of Health Promotion and Human Behavior, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine/ School of Public Health
Principal investigator: Professor Toshi A. Furukawa, MD, PhD
Japan
Mental health problems among university students can lead to lowered academic performances, impaired social relationships, and subsequent development of more serious health and social problems. Universities have been adopting various strategies to help with distressed students, while facing challenges of limited face-to-face interventions. Under the COVID-19 pandemic, physical distancing policies to prevent infection may have exacerbated social isolation especially among young populations, including university students.
Under these circumstances, online-based therapeutic or preventive measures for mental health issues has been highlighted, due to accessibility and lower cost. The effectiveness of such internet cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) programs to alleviate depressive and anxiety symptoms has been supported by accumulating evidence1,2. In order to further maximize the impact of the therapy, it needs to be tailored to individual needs and characteristics.
To address this challenge, Kyoto University implemented the “Healthy Campus Trial” from 2018 to 2021. It was a multi-center, randomized, fully factorial trial, designed to examine and optimize the efficacy of five CBT components delivered by a smartphone app. In total 64 combinations of the five treatment components were delivered to 1,093 participants recruited from five universities in Kansai and Chubu Region, Japan. The primary analysis aimed to examine the average short-term effect among all the recruited participants. Findings suggested that depressive symptoms were significantly reduced for all participants after 8 weeks, although we failed to identify any particular components or their combinations that were superior than others in general. The long-term effect of depression prevention remains unclear. Furthermore, even though the average effects of these CBT components were similar, individuals might have differential responses. Therefore, further secondary analyses such as developing an algorithm that can optimize the treatment based on individual characteristics are warranted.
References
Secondary analyses on the established data from the Healthy Campus Trial are to be conducted. In this trial, 1,093 participants were recruited from five universities between September 2018 to May 2021. They were randomized to receive 64 different combinations of five CBT components delivered by smartphone app, which aimed to alleviate depressive symptoms. The baseline characteristics including demographics, personality, CBT skills, baseline depression and anxiety severity, presenteeism, etc. were collected. Then, depression and anxiety severity were assessed weekly until 8 weeks, and then every 4 weeks after that until 52 weeks.
The planned secondary analyses include:
For Objective (1): Investigate the long-term depression prevention effect of the digital mental health intervention:
The overall incidence of depression within one year, as determined by the computerized Composite International Diagnostic Interview
(CIDI), was 10.2% among the participants. Similar to the results of the short-term effect analysis, we could not identify any smartphone CBT components that were significantly better than others on average. The hazard ratio for each component was
between 0.843 to 1.259, none of which was found statistically significant. Our next step is to construct a prediction model that estimates the probability of developing depression within one year and the probable decrease in the incidence with different
combinations of smartphone CBT components, based on individual baseline characteristics.
For Objective (2): Generate evidence-based, individualized strategies that can efficiently deliver optimal digital mental health intervention
components, in order to maximize young people’s mental health under the COVID-19 pandemic:
To produce personalized treatment strategies for individual participants, we first attempted to classify university students with subthreshold depression
into several subtypes based on their CBT skills, before any treatments were given. A hierarchical clustering analysis categorized the students into three clusters: reflective low-skilled students, non-reflective high-skilled students, and non-reflective
low-skilled students. We observed that non-reflective low-skilled students had significantly higher levels of depression compared to the other two types. These findings suggest that digital mental health interventions for university students may need
to be tailored to their CBT skills profiles.
As mentioned in the Methods section, we utilized two distinctive approaches to generate individualized evidence for optimizing the alleviation of depressive symptoms among university students
using a smartphone CBT app. The first approach involved examining treatment-by-covariate interactions between personal baseline characteristics and the short-term effect of CBT components, using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures. Findings
indicated that higher PHQ-9 scores at baseline corresponded to greater symptom reduction after 8 weeks, while more frequent exercise habits correlated with reduced effectiveness of the self-monitoring component.
Our second approach
involved using a novel 2-stage statistical algorithm to create a model that predicts PHQ-9 scores at 8 weeks after treatment with different CBT components for individuals based on their baseline characteristics. Overall, even without other CBT components,
weekly self-checks of the PHQ-9 alone substantially reduced depression. With the model, we can predict the degree of improvement for different combinations of components more accurately. We made an R Shiny web application to provide interactive visualization
of these predictions. The web app can help participant understand the scientific evidence and facilitate efficient decision-making when selecting optimal CBT components.
In addition, we also analysed the characteristics of participants
that were related to their adherence to the CBT components. Overall, we found that the adherence was high (82-91% depending on the component). The analysis showed that participants who scored high on the personality trait of conscientiousness and
those who were female were more likely to complete the components of the digital CBT program.
Additional analysis:
Although our primary interest was optimizing the digital interventions to improve university students’ mental
distress during the COVID-19 pandemic, our trial began recruitment before the pandemic. This allowed us to analyse the impact of the pandemic, specifically the state of emergency declaration, on students’ mental status using the interrupted
time series analysis. The results suggested that students’ stress tended to increase with the start of a new semester regardless of the state of emergency declaration, and the declaration did not significantly impact the students’ mental
health.
This will be the first individualized optimization algorithm for digital CBT components in improving depressive symptoms for university students. Although the proposed prediction model per se may need further external validation in order to be disseminated outside Japan, the methodology we use can be generalized globally when approaching such precision medicine goals. The baseline features that are revealed to be interacted with the intervention may shed lights on future trial designs in academic world, and may influence decision-making in public health and clinical practice regarding university students’ mental health.
As the prediction model is built on a large-scale randomized trial in Japan, we plan to propose the findings and the individualized intervention optimization algorithm to Japanese universities and local government directly. We expect it can help the university health administrations successfully deliver the optimal interventions to students who need it based on the best evidence.